A year and a half. That’s how long it has been since The Browser Company actually added any new meaningful feature to the Arc browser. Despite that, it maintains a respectable number of users because of its existing features that work excellently and its aesthetics. I’m one of them.

While I was browsing through Reddit, I came across a post on r/ArcBrowser that showed a screenshot of someone receiving an email from The Browser Company. The email tries to make Arc users switch over to Dia, while making the argument that it was built by the “same team.”

Email about switching to Dia from Arc.

“Everything you love about Arc is now in Dia,” the email says. However, this isn’t true. Dia still misses out on some important features of Arc, such as the “Little Arc” floating windows, which you can either expand into any workspace or purge when you don’t want it cluttering your tabs. The company also promises “more speed” and “more security” with Dia, and they’ve made switching over easier.

So, what is going on here? On one hand, Arc continues to receive security updates every week or so. If there are major bugs that break the experience (like the YouTube full-screen bug we previously reported on), they get swift fixes as well. On the other hand, The Browser Company doesn’t really want you to use Arc. They are directly asking people to move over to Dia, emphasizing how it’s “similar” to Arc.

Putting two and two together, could they abandon the browser entirely? We can’t say for sure. Don’t treat this as official confirmation from The Browser Company that Arc will stop getting the regular Chromium/security updates or major fixes. It’s not that. The major point I’m trying to make here is that nudging users to move away from a browser doesn’t give me much hope about its future.

Even if they don’t exactly “announce” a complete abandonment of Arc, I don’t see the brightest future for it. I’d want the company to continue issuing the bare-minimum patches to keep it afloat, and for now they’re doing that. How long this will go on is what’s uncertain, especially after those emails.

Mentioning this once again: The Browser Company hasn’t formally announced any changes to how they handle the browser. This is just a speculative article that’s collecting some info together. For once, I actually want to be wrong, and I don’t want anything to change.

It’s not like I haven’t tried any replacement browsers. Recently, I tried the “Crest” browser, which came remarkably close. I don’t think it’s ready to replace Arc just yet, though. More on that here.

Want to know why I still cling to Arc? I wrote a complete explainer here.

 
✦
PiunikaWeb’s Take

The Browser Company is likely pushing Dia heavily because that browser is a funnel into making people pay for subscriptions. Soon, all of the AI features on Dia will be locked behind a paywall, and if they move over the Arc users, that’s yet another customer base that they can obtain revenue from. This is one alternative explanation to why the company is sending out those emails.

Even without the AI subscription, Dia enjoys the benefits of Chromium (which Zen doesn’t), and it has “most” of the features of Arc. It doesn’t have everything yet.

 

We stand out from the tech-media crowd because we break news stories; we mainly bring you stuff that you won’t find anywhere in the mainstream tech media. Our stories have been picked up by some of the world’s most popular websites and media outlets—more info is available here.

Sudhanshu K
323 Posts

I have been a consumer technology enthusiast for over 5 years. Thanks to my experience in software beta testing and product reviews, I've understood and learnt a lot about what bugs and issues bother people, and I spend time trying to simplify their solutions. I cover smartphones, software, social media, apps, AI, and most consumer tech gadgets. Actively pursuing a Computer Science bachelor’s degree. I'm mostly active on Twitter/X (@TechWhirlUlt), drop a DM or tag me if you want to share info or connect!