A couple of days ago, I reported how Grok’s still letting people undress women and minors in public threads. What started as a concerning issue has turned into a full-blown controversy, with thousands of posts and discussions flooding the platform about the AI’s troubling behavior.

The backlash is getting serious. I spotted a post today from Shubham Gupta, a legal advocate in India who’s actually advising affected individuals to file complaints with local cyber police.

grok-police-complaint-for-undress-images-india

According to his post, offenses under sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, along with sections 77 and 336(4) of Bhartiya Nyay Sangita, could apply to these situations. He emphasized that victims don’t even need to know the harasser’s identity; just a screenshot and profile link are enough to file a complaint.

In the States, people are also kicking up the lawsuit question. One post from AvaGG got thousands of likes when they asked, “Could there be a class action lawsuit against Twitter for grok non consentually undressing women and the people abusing it?”

grok-lawsuit-undress-generations

Meanwhile, X has taken some action. Grok’s media tab got completely purged, and fresh generations on that tab seem to be free from the lingerie content that previously dominated it. Still, the damage is already done, and it’s unclear what actual restrictions have been put in place to prevent this from happening again.

But here’s where things get interesting. I came across a mock-up from user @elder_plinius showing a toggle labeled “Enable Grok Replies” that would let users control whether Grok can respond in their threads at all. The community reaction has been pretty mixed.

grok-enable-replies-mockup-setting

Some users think it’s brilliant, with comments like “so crazy it just might work” and “it really could be this simple.” Others questioned whether it’s even real or wondered if blocking Grok would achieve the same result.

However, I wouldn’t hold my breath for X to add such a toggle. Part of Grok’s success comes from people using it under posts to fact-check information shared. So it’s unlikely X would give users an option to disable Grok in their replies entirely.

That said, even if X gave users the option to prevent Grok from generating images in their replies, it would solve the problem publicly. No more “Grok put her in a bikini” requests would be entertained under posts. In my books, that would be a win-win for users, especially women who’ve become targets, and for X, since it wouldn’t face the same level of backlash while still keeping Grok available for fact-checking and general responses.

We stand out from the tech-media crowd because we break news stories; we mainly bring you stuff that you won’t find anywhere in the mainstream tech media. Our stories have been picked up by some of the world’s most popular websites and media outlets—more info is available here.

Dwayne Cubbins
2670 Posts

I cover fast-moving stories across apps, online platforms, and everyday tech — phones, wearables, consoles, and whatever else people are fighting with this week. Bugs, rollouts, scams, policy enforcement, and the occasional internet-culture rabbit hole are all fair game. My goal is simple — make confusing tech news readable. When I'm not working, I'm working out or chilling with my dog. Got a tip? You can find me on X @dcubbins.

Next article View Article

YouTube background play not working on Brave Browser app? Try these potential workarounds

Update 31/01/26 - 09:22 am (IST): Brave's support team has confirmed that the company is aware and investigating the issue. They've also provided the same workaround...
Jan 12, 2026 3 Min Read